Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41008 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 1161 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2008 18:32:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Oct 2008 18:32:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.163 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.163 il-gw1.zend.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [212.25.124.163] ([212.25.124.163:49932] helo=il-gw1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C1/BE-25867-3A5E4F84 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:32:05 -0400 Received: from us-ex1.zend.com ([192.168.16.5]) by il-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:32:22 +0200 Received: from [192.168.16.110] ([192.168.16.110]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:32:19 -0700 Message-ID: <48F4E5B3.2030000@zend.com> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:32:19 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steph Fox CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <652122.8719.qm@web708.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <48F4D832.7010708@zend.com> <033701c92e24$d9ca3d60$3ffc1f3e@foxbox> <48F4DF7E.1070202@zend.com> <038301c92e29$aa8f3aa0$3ffc1f3e@foxbox> In-Reply-To: <038301c92e29$aa8f3aa0$3ffc1f3e@foxbox> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Oct 2008 18:32:19.0210 (UTC) FILETIME=[30B046A0:01C92E2B] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] namespaces and alpha3 From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > We are in alpha indeed, and still looking at proposals, and still > without consensus. The last thing I'd want is to see namespace support > pushed under the carpet, but I'd rather see it at this stage of > development as part of the PHP 6 development cycle (as originally Why? What would happen then that can't happen now? > in its final form. To me at least, that means namespace support is > starting to look less and less feasible for 5.3 unless we can agree to > never extend namespace support beyond classes. Which we don't. We could agree on anything, if we only actually worked on agreeing, instead of working on it not happening. I am really surprised why you put so much effort into trying to undo the much needed feature. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com