Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:40994
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 72.14.220.158 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=xbptfkcGQ+XjmxJRhS5Oc8rKlyuG0uq7nSsJP/DWXEmR3aU8J1kzCLSGUKyi8UZxtd
         6hzhW9ZxbIULeoV5wMcLf+CHzwWvt4/Y1ZHsIYdS8Xr4prxaVMZFGhIChmiZWZqucloE
         0wGLWAr9vfjUXg9/nTNE7hhEZgZujnmJDwvOQ=
Message-ID: <8cf711460810140642w4268c7e3yde5628b67a85d74b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:42:54 +0100
Sender: mikko.koppanen@gmail.com
To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?=" <david.zuelke@bitextender.com>
Cc: "Steph Fox" <steph@php.net>, technique@dev-solutions.fr, 
	"James Dempster" <letssurf@gmail.com>, 
	"PHP Development" <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <7D21AE34-88EE-4430-A36B-5E50B3E0E1C8@bitextender.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <3CF765DF-27AF-44FD-9ECF-BEBFC8A0AFCA@pooteeweet.org>
	 <2CA7AC96-AD48-4F5D-B945-2D961B4AB57C@googlemail.com>
	 <462e563f0810140112x3babae20t647a10322e76df8e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1223973712.7708.10.camel@stephane-dell>
	 <014401c92df5$e70d8470$3ffc1f3e@foxbox>
	 <7D21AE34-88EE-4430-A36B-5E50B3E0E1C8@bitextender.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] namespaces and alpha3
From: mkoppanen@php.net ("Mikko Koppanen")

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:27 PM, David Z=FClke
<david.zuelke@bitextender.com> wrote:
> Am 14.10.2008 um 14:10 schrieb Steph Fox:
>
>>>> > On 10 Oct 2008, at 06:03, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >  1) rip them out
>>>> >
>>>> > I'm +1 on this. We simply don't have consensus, and I don't see anyw=
ay
>>>> > > we
>>>> > can have consensus by the time 5.3 has to be frozen. Once namespaces=
 >
>>>> > are in,
>>>> > we're gonna have to stick with whatever we choose, unless we totally=
 >
>>>> > break
>>>> > BC.
>>>>
>>>> I'd agree with this, leave something with such a big impact to version
>>>> 6. At
>>>> least it gives time to get it right.
>>>
>> I'm +1 on ripping out and leaving til 6.0.
>
> +1 from me, too. Getting it right takes time. If that means 6.0, fine.

+1 for removal.

--=20
Mikko Koppanen