Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:40993
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.46.31 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:references;
        b=BOIj3nub59UnoLLe1WQgUajwmYK/KvE1F/xBiRvnKXiSerfCUJIg/9uu1RskMYQe96
         2ofDBacCsaHcXhLEG8dqgowAPKt5i+maUTkdP0smWfRXQAwXMeRTRUK45Wnfo20QbrxT
         DZU9qGxZt42rbiK+TCYYtdHop/vUlPWSGl2KI=
Message-ID: <261daaa10810140635w36c05e27lefc5253196529f6d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:35:17 +0300
To: "Ryan Panning" <rpanning@gmail.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <AC.50.25867.55C94F84@pb1.pair.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_6622_20770546.1223991317178"
References: <3CF765DF-27AF-44FD-9ECF-BEBFC8A0AFCA@pooteeweet.org>
	 <2CA7AC96-AD48-4F5D-B945-2D961B4AB57C@googlemail.com>
	 <462e563f0810140112x3babae20t647a10322e76df8e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1223973712.7708.10.camel@stephane-dell>
	 <014401c92df5$e70d8470$3ffc1f3e@foxbox>
	 <48F48E9E.6050807@iamjochem.com> <AC.50.25867.55C94F84@pb1.pair.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] namespaces and alpha3
From: kenashkov@gmail.com ("Vesselin Kenashkov")

------=_Part_6622_20770546.1223991317178
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I see the point and objections against "quick and dirty", but on the other
hand the discussion about the namespaces started long time ago - two years
already? If for two years there wasn't an agreement how they have to be
implemented (or even whether to add them at all! because I see many comments
in this sense) what are the reasons to think that in the next 5-6 months,
when php6 will reach its "release stage" with the first alphas, this will be
done?
Even the namespaces dont go in php5.3 I think a solution/agreement has to be
found quickly because it looks like php 6.0 could be in the same situation
after few months.


On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Ryan Panning <rpanning@gmail.com> wrote:

> Jochem Maas wrote:
>
>>  1) rip them out
>>>>>>
>>>>> +1 ... I concur with Steph's opinion
>>
>
> Also +1 for taking them out.
>
> Namespaces should be saved for PHP 6 IMO as well. Now that the current
> namespaces have been tested there is at least a starting point for
> discussion. And that discussion has started as everyone knows. But I think
> that any decisions will not be made for a timely 5.3 release or the "quick
> and dirty" option will win. In the long run it needs to be done right, not
> in a hurry.
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>


-- 
Vesselin Kenashkov
developer at
www.webstudiobulgaria.com

------=_Part_6622_20770546.1223991317178--