Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:40888 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 49512 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2008 13:17:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Oct 2008 13:17:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=et@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=et@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 62.75.137.136 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: et@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 62.75.137.136 fuer-et.de Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [62.75.137.136] ([62.75.137.136:33251] helo=eve.fuer-et.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 30/75-48736-8740EE84 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:17:46 -0400 Received: from lapalma.mis.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (lapalma.mis.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.165.195]) by eve.fuer-et.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401A71583F8 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:17:42 +0200 (CEST) To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:17:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <48EDFEED.8080605@adplabs.com.br> <261daaa10810090607h1876200ex1efa43a40cfb24c2@mail.gmail.com> <48EE0387.3040802@adplabs.com.br> In-Reply-To: <48EE0387.3040802@adplabs.com.br> X-PGP-Key-URL: http://www.mis.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/People/walk/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <200810091517.37703.et@php.net> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] json_encode ignores protected/private class members From: et@php.net (Stefan Walk) On Thursday 09 October 2008 15:13:43 Jarismar Chaves da Silva wrote: > Ok, nice solution, but I still don't see why json_encode ignores > protected/private class members. I mean, why we need this feature. Because, in theory, it shouldn't even be able to see those members? Regards, Stefan