Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:40678 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 68856 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2008 06:27:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Sep 2008 06:27:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=jani.taskinen@sci.fi; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=jani.taskinen@sci.fi; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain sci.fi from 63.208.196.179 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: jani.taskinen@sci.fi X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.208.196.179 mho-02-bos.mailhop.org Received: from [63.208.196.179] ([63.208.196.179:54977] helo=mho-02-bos.mailhop.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 45/E0-64272-56F2BD84 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:27:49 -0400 Received: from a88-112-30-186.elisa-laajakaista.fi ([88.112.30.186] helo=localhost.localdomain) by mho-02-bos.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KikKI-00090J-FS; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 06:27:46 +0000 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 88.112.30.186 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.mailhop.org/outbound/abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/CUBIKsN0MZmvNJVfH8UkXArGvBHqQb+c= Message-ID: <48DB2F60.3020404@sci.fi> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:27:44 +0300 Reply-To: jani.taskinen@iki.fi User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ilia Cheishvili CC: PHP internals References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Fix Bug #46145 From: jani.taskinen@sci.fi (Jani Taskinen) Ilia Cheishvili wrote: > Hey all, > > This patch addresses the *printf() bug when dealing with exponents > (%e). See http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=46145 for more details. > > The patch is large because there were a lot of unit tests written to > expect the wrong behavior, so I had to update them. I realize that > there is the possibility that we might decide to label this as a "won't > fix", but I figured I might as well put forth the effort :) You can always make separate patches (preferred) for tests and code changes. :) When did it start misbehaving anyway? If it was like that all the time -> wont fix, depending of course how long %e has existed.. --Jani