Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:40671 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89679 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2008 23:00:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Sep 2008 23:00:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=greg@chiaraquartet.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=greg@chiaraquartet.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain chiaraquartet.net from 208.83.222.18 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: greg@chiaraquartet.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 208.83.222.18 unknown Linux 2.6 Received: from [208.83.222.18] ([208.83.222.18:42551] helo=mail.bluga.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5E/EE-52685-196CAD84 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:00:33 -0400 Received: from mail.bluga.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bluga.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58309C0E41C; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:59:28 -0700 (MST) Received: from Greg-Beavers-monster.local (unknown [65.119.49.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bluga.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB437C0E411; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:59:27 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <48DAC68D.5070607@chiaraquartet.net> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:00:29 -0500 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070807) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Wallner CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <19.DC.27717.E51E7D84@pb1.pair.com> In-Reply-To: <19.DC.27717.E51E7D84@pb1.pair.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: Adding pecl/http to core From: greg@chiaraquartet.net (Greg Beaver) Michael Wallner wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder what the general opinion is on adding pecl/http to the main PHP > distribution? Many people have poked me in the past, so I guessed it's > time to ask me and you that question once for all. +1 Greg