Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:40665 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 37579 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2008 13:46:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Sep 2008 13:46:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=sv_forums@fmethod.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=sv_forums@fmethod.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fmethod.com from 69.16.228.148 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: sv_forums@fmethod.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 69.16.228.148 unknown Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [69.16.228.148] ([69.16.228.148:56893] helo=host.fmethod.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 09/E0-52685-8C44AD84 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:46:48 -0400 Received: from [83.228.56.37] (port=2017 helo=pc) by host.fmethod.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KiUhZ-0007jz-63 for internals@lists.php.net; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:46:45 -0500 Message-ID: To: "'PHP Internals'" References: <48D7F5EF.3090202@zend.com> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:46:38 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.fmethod.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.php.net X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - fmethod.com Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] namespace issues From: sv_forums@fmethod.com ("Stan Vassilev | FM") Hi, 1. and 2. are great. I'm happy to see this done. But for 3. I think that's throwing the baby with the bathwater. Since now global classes inside namespaces will need the "use ::Foo;" or "::Foo...", I hope you can give a fresh look at my original idea that both functions and classes require the "use ::foo" or "::foo()" when in a namespace, and leave namespaced functions in. Regards, Stan Vassilev