Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:40651
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.232 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=u3PSP7m5SRhmA1Ox/14fCaZftBWsYi+UjKeNcCmebrVx3v2ubAMRWiXnaxYUpGtjSc
         ApDN+QHqE8FZ16Py3wNI3T5nhGqDWf+P1yrH/H+ozFeu12FkRgwxzj+pkTJXryEpvgW1
         w9BQtHLndRal/tM6hyFwHGMv6ZtyncjWL5WQc=
Message-ID: <bcb7aa500809231617y3305b5bcn18f47630a8124e0d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:17:17 -0300
To: "Steph Fox" <steph@php.net>
Cc: "Kevin Waterson" <kevin@phpro.org>, internals@lists.php.net, 
	"Andi Gutmans" <andi@php.net>
In-Reply-To: <002701c91dd1$89dad480$3ffc1f3e@foxbox>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <59.6C.35835.FB3F8D84@pb1.pair.com>
	 <20080924065741.50a30448.kevin@phpro.org>
	 <002701c91dd1$89dad480$3ffc1f3e@foxbox>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] true namespaces, yet another point of view
From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com ("Guilherme Blanco")

For those that do not understand very well the explanation of jvlad...

He's suggesting to change the class struct to be an scope struct, and
have a property that tells if it's a namespace or a class, and reuse
the implementation of class which already works very well.
The nested support is achieved afai understand through the Adjacency
List algorithm... can you confirm this to me?

Just trying to be more clear to those that do not understand... if my
words are greek now.... GIYF (Google Is Your Friend).


Cheers,

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Steph Fox <steph@php.net> wrote:
>> Lets just let it die. It is un-needed, un-wanted by many, and the end
>> result seems to be less that optimal, or even a true implementation
>> of namespaces.
>
> Oddly enough, I agree with Kevin with my heart and soul. But then I hear the
> howls of outrage from the Other Side, who campaigned without ruth to get
> namespaces into PHP in the first place.
>
> Would someone with authority (Andi? Derick?) like to give an overview of the
> pros, cons and issues at this point? It's quite difficult to follow all
> these tiny, endless myco-esque threads, and I share Greg's allergy to wikis
> for the simple reason that the model is similar. Each item sparks another.
>
> - Steph
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>



-- 
Guilherme Blanco - Web Developer
CBC - Certified Bindows Consultant
Cell Phone: +55 (16) 9166-6902
MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
URL: http://blog.bisna.com
Rio de Janeiro - RJ/Brazil