Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:40632 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 48776 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2008 12:02:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Sep 2008 12:02:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lstrojny@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lstrojny@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 78.46.69.2 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lstrojny@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 78.46.69.2 milch.schokokeks.org Received: from [78.46.69.2] ([78.46.69.2:55925] helo=milch.schokokeks.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9A/94-35835-BEAD8D84 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:02:52 -0400 Received: from [10.88.8.133] (colt-d53d2146.colt.mediaventures.de [::ffff:213.61.33.70]) (AUTH: PLAIN lars@schokokeks.org, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,CAMELLIA256-SHA) by milch.schokokeks.org with esmtp; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:02:48 +0200 id 000000000000C008.0000000048D8DAE9.000077F5 To: Michael Wallner Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <19.DC.27717.E51E7D84@pb1.pair.com> References: <19.DC.27717.E51E7D84@pb1.pair.com> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:02:47 +0200 Message-ID: <1222171368.4213.7.camel@lstrojny> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=_milch.schokokeks.org-30709-1222171369-0001-2" X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Adding pecl/http to core From: lstrojny@php.net (Lars Strojny) --=_milch.schokokeks.org-30709-1222171369-0001-2 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Michael, Am Montag, den 22.09.2008, 20:17 +0200 schrieb Michael Wallner: [...] > I wonder what the general opinion is on adding pecl/http to the main PHP > distribution? Many people have poked me in the past, so I guessed it's > time to ask me and you that question once for all. I would like to see pecl_http in just not in 5.3. I think we are too far in the release process to do the required work to add it. And API review would be required (I didn't looked at it closely but is), general code review and so on. Of course I do not speak for our release managers, but I would say "yes, but". cu, Lars --=20 Jabber: lars@strojny.net Weblog: http://usrportage.de --=_milch.schokokeks.org-30709-1222171369-0001-2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJI2NrnAAoJECQPF+sCY6wHYF0P/28gR9Y6jDVTcUjywlnd7+5z QZ0aSic8R5zZdkI7q0Lw7qAAzp1DlT5XncgR+V0RSy0JfVDK6qY0GkpswPIRL/eP Euh4Q1zkvAvTR3EG6BHWvk5e/6ymyFgBxCzLrE3uHbAuWRTP/MFK0ACh8cxDQTwq vs7HR0pg6KNq0jhMY0oKAbvvZtnX4A1l+49JvaG4X/u7hfzNHbk2BNuG1VMZ3quo GZ+19NRkN6qUVitnUaUKJABwOQ++dQfZ5oMCQR1YsEwbR/H15ZRc/spQwgtDik10 VqOno/iVVC5JfdkRlyHS1Gt3vrbyd+GBpYrqdwtNP+8nNwNVvMT+Mv3UJJFr15RW ErfDlpefYt+JLYxyFOZzI1BSz0TyLvDIl8409/Mph0Zt0vbdiIZw3/E2DkuIbTgs QS9npKPRNt719oFbZYVe5dCFhQ3TdlI+ftTzs4leTgJfvQPyMTluGPM26oolLJ6G yQZEIUjJCj4hwpgXPfy6Q9TA92FbmZTtZrIofXQgI4Fw6xCA0tRLTXFOe+Tdw7Tf SZjKLoC49jvdx/g3Hq5Qk4D2LYET1cZT0W6/tA2++cBQ75w8s0+WcVgxZT4nLHuU n4QlZyt2AsVq2bCMb1cgt7jDlXqPxqcHPWr6OUrxM0MVouBg6k4YWqCjoMAFqBP/ rNyCOK0CKCI3Gj27VJOX =5KLP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_milch.schokokeks.org-30709-1222171369-0001-2--