Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:40487 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 51447 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2008 20:49:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Sep 2008 20:49:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=sv_forums@fmethod.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=sv_forums@fmethod.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fmethod.com from 69.16.228.148 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: sv_forums@fmethod.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 69.16.228.148 unknown Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [69.16.228.148] ([69.16.228.148:40215] helo=host.fmethod.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 27/EC-22777-5C5DAC84 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:49:10 -0400 Received: from [83.228.56.37] (port=3713 helo=pc) by host.fmethod.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KeFZi-0003Zw-Mc; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:49:07 -0500 Message-ID: <4F1D311FFD654309A230706E9FFB624C@pc> To: "Gregory Beaver" Cc: References: <48C9F44B.7020008@chiaraquartet.net> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:48:56 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="windows-1251"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.fmethod.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.php.net X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - fmethod.com Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Scoping of "use" statements and a strategy for 5.3/6.0 release of namespace From: sv_forums@fmethod.com ("Stan Vassilev | FM") > Hi Stan, > > I realized I missed 2 of your points, response below: > Hi, Thanks for your work on resolving these issues. My comments about use/namespace being a hack regards just the syntax, I was wrong about the scoping of use, but also having "namespace" act as a scope without the scope syntax {} will possibly be confusing. But, it'll work fine enough. Regards, Stan Vassilev