Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:40486 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 49643 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2008 20:35:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Sep 2008 20:35:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=domluc@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=domluc@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.46.28 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: domluc@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.46.28 yw-out-2324.google.com Received: from [74.125.46.28] ([74.125.46.28:18183] helo=yw-out-2324.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 3D/7C-22777-092DAC84 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:35:28 -0400 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 5so395886ywb.83 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:35:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=68km4+pGLPDCcUlgmuZUrIX6FXknp+rpvtDPME3DN4Q=; b=KHkzmzwDCTyhui+g7SSdR8dpQrXPRHPH3NWzEIjBuAedX2+dkuOORfSIoKtWi2ljAM GHjfEohTtzQSGHqL/OMw7XHJKYTOVU1C0IJuItsiLbySF47FDm69FZ8sVaPu4Ji7SD8K MCt0tdERTuuawwHnJWePcxGUHxspi9cPs9r4w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=EHMxYjw93tMKF6Pv5T5/et+50nTZV1ZKvUwaq40wdk7wzTA7btqL8cyed5CEmYDKyJ 2MFCga50ivl2Tsqwxw+oKYq7+LflPecW6Nq2zbtttNN8yzQ4sPhpMw9CrK7LndeLlUO5 A0gMLTGNnY/2oKNkgk2oz02Nrz4mnjgJYaWRs= Received: by 10.103.17.13 with SMTP id u13mr3333702mui.90.1221251724118; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:35:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.225.8 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:35:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:35:24 -0300 To: internals@lists.php.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: the namespace war From: domluc@gmail.com ("Lucas Stephanou") So, after this msg(my second on list) maybe you will scream with me, but. This namespace war is putting you focus on a great feature, but maybe losing time with lot of discussion. namespace foo; or namespace foo{ (...) } are both good options, but can we stop the war and go forward, as php user I was losing with this fight. My opinion is that namespace foo{} is best for all, some cache systems that rely on concat files maybe will break with namespace; option ps.: sorry for breaking this discussion on the middle -- Lucas Stephanou