Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:40390 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29050 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2008 02:58:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Sep 2008 02:58:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.224 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.224 rv-out-0506.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.224] ([209.85.198.224:17486] helo=rv-out-0506.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5B/62-14433-616E5C84 for ; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:57:45 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so1643467rvb.23 for ; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:57:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ALMAg3WR1Vrzl4li9fmLdSsyUp22NemVpBJrpUT+lvw=; b=nL0EbRH0yxz+WeL136usSDXxR9VMytzHgQqP2en9fPV3oCkm4HGE56930ICyhx9wgI RYgRVi1+NYmQn6lYQHulvKl1vuDHz8HPsFtuMfvWBAicj59+1KFr7VaBGqrGyY8RNBYR gXsXSQ5jt1nSX0finlgEPozzKepx1N9TNzcFI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=dRXrSrTmr1QAiCXP4Gtib7jcAjksw+a3MnTxLnWazjk/GhTExXkA5xLdgg2repNSct 0xaAjqjtdwOOnrAoeuQ5Kt83vA9YBpEHGbdxlwFq+jGiFmV3YGWjmM4DCGE9thN1mYhE +XTvxSVwff2kIrq5SCloYVzdRdHDEX3L41VQo= Received: by 10.141.74.17 with SMTP id b17mr9349517rvl.119.1220929026680; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.63.14 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 19:57:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 23:57:01 -0300 To: "Stan Vassilev | FM" Cc: "PHP Internals" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48C5CDF8.3060108@zend.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Suggestion to increase the max_input_nesting_level From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com ("Guilherme Blanco") Yeah... recursion depth. Sorry, I wrongly typed it. I think it may be cleaner now... On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Stan Vassilev | FM wrote: > > Hi, > > He means recursion depth, not input nesting depth. 5.3 had a proposed fast > function call algorithm which would avoid the stack limit and allow deeper > recursion, was this accepted and how does it affect the limit of 100 nested > calls? > > Regards, > Stan Vassilev > >> Hi! >> >>> Currently I'm working on the compiler, which has this BNF: >>> http://trac.doctrine-project.org/browser/trunk/query-language.txt >>> I've done a lot of optimizations to be able to not touch the default >>> nesting input level, but doing that I added a lot of restrictions that >>> now are my bottlenecks. >> >> I'm not sure I understand - how this compiler is related to input nesting >> level? What exactly you do there that requires 150+ levels of nesting on >> input? > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Guilherme Blanco - Web Developer CBC - Certified Bindows Consultant Cell Phone: +55 (16) 9166-6902 MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com URL: http://blog.bisna.com Rio de Janeiro - RJ/Brazil