Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:40294 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75511 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2008 00:01:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Sep 2008 00:01:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.163 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.163 il-gw1.zend.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [212.25.124.163] ([212.25.124.163:54157] helo=il-gw1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1D/43-56363-E58C1C84 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:01:36 -0400 Received: from us-ex1.zend.com ([192.168.16.5]) by il-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 03:02:40 +0300 Received: from [192.168.16.110] ([192.168.16.110]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 5 Sep 2008 17:02:37 -0700 Message-ID: <48C1C89D.2050603@zend.com> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:02:37 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye CC: PHP Internals List References: <20080904190717.aaz97tz688oogc4c@horde.chinstrap.eu> <48C0488C.9090209@sci.fi> <48C04E6A.2080909@zend.com> <48C1A51D.5030803@zend.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Sep 2008 00:02:37.0427 (UTC) FILETIME=[DF27F430:01C90FB3] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: ini-parsing, double quotes, windows in 5.3 From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > That's exactly why I am reluctant to change what Jani did. It is > easier to deal with this minor breakage in 5.3.0 and then have a > consistent and clean configuration system. Continuing to add some > exceptions while hoping that "no weird things" are used is a bad idea Do you see any problem with my patch? Any weird things? > Jani even suggested to add _fatal_ error. The lack of error messages > was one of the main arguments against this feature. No, the main argument is that it would break people's configs, and for no good reason at all (nobody really needs \n's in their paths). -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com