Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:40215 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 18824 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2008 16:57:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Sep 2008 16:57:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.163 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.163 il-gw1.zend.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [212.25.124.163] ([212.25.124.163:31693] helo=il-gw1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 82/C0-33714-3807DB84 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:57:40 -0400 Received: from us-ex1.zend.com ([192.168.16.5]) by il-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 2 Sep 2008 19:58:42 +0300 Received: from [192.168.16.110] ([192.168.16.110]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:58:39 -0700 Message-ID: <48BD70BF.5030705@zend.com> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:58:39 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcus Boerger CC: Lukas Kahwe Smith , PHP Internals List References: <0E6B0C09-99C4-4843-A8E6-0B015EB98B4E@pooteeweet.org> <48BCF217.3010401@zend.com> <1749932734.20080902140419@marcus-boerger.de> In-Reply-To: <1749932734.20080902140419@marcus-boerger.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Sep 2008 16:58:39.0658 (UTC) FILETIME=[25D330A0:01C90D1D] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] namespace RFC From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > I am sorry but I absolutely fail to see how the following is in any way > whatsoever unclear: This is clear, I understand that and think it is completely wrong and misguided, for reasons I described in my last email. What I did not understand is what code you wanted to allow outside namespaces and what all that include part and strings/not strings distinction talks about. > namespace A::B::C::D::E::F; > $obj = new G; > > Now what? Now G is either A::B::C::D::E::F::G or ::G, but never A::B::G etc. Do you understand the difference? No hierarchy. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com