Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:40161 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89923 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2008 16:56:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Aug 2008 16:56:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.236 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.236 rv-out-0506.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.236] ([209.85.198.236:53266] helo=rv-out-0506.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 78/75-27196-3CB79B84 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 12:56:35 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so1232390rvb.23 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:56:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=OYkweXg2stJkMPhjjgphFZyBOEExMFXBeQQJUtTWIbM=; b=nR/pRDqPp22/i+ec1z4/tCpZ9sqd9F9SiedfM1SSpNjZxNwjepTEdMzgHHgoVt7UZs 1hrOm21ouAFYuuvOGx5FBbJ50qTzuJcn02j7LIyLpFVdr6Sfd0Onb/BWevOasrvyUZ1u bmS0I12PGuREKHhxoYIQVzembRMzwFATVt458= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=LUwiB8NsrxwgH/kZ01/etDSx/2u+DwoVdKutNNvAW4cRqWyguKJuV9MzE7ZDzwAl+c p4OepGlkYe2vlMHMphzasxxRYC/RCMtvDSYdKG2n3shdj8R3tCPRzQIhoMoCOUCs8Mjh vN3BC7MF9Qh/ALSd+06AIyKFq/ELOvPRVVqh4= Received: by 10.141.74.17 with SMTP id b17mr2259717rvl.119.1220115392565; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:56:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.178.14 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:56:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 18:56:32 +0200 To: "Greg Beaver" Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <48B9781E.60502@chiaraquartet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48B955FD.804@chiaraquartet.net> <48B9781E.60502@chiaraquartet.net> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] phar in win32 snapshots From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye") hi, On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Greg Beaver wrote: > Pierre Joye wrote: >> hi, >> >> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Greg Beaver wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there a reason phar is built shared in win32 snapshots even though >>> the default in config.w32 is to build it statically? >>> >> >> The default config.w32 (besides being wrong) is shared. >> >> Why should it be built statically? > > It builds statically in vs 2008 with PHP_5_3 on my box, you are > mistaken. For reasoning on static build, see the list archive. Can you try to actually what is used to build a release please? cscript /nologo configure.js --enable-snapshot-build --enable-debug-pack And I still have no answer to my question. Why should it be built statically? The change has been introduced with the extension dependencies patch (or in the same period, to be checked, post alpha2 anyway). Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org