Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:40112 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 82900 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2008 21:47:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Aug 2008 21:47:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:38122] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EB/3D-03720-76BC5B84 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:47:20 -0400 Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH (unknown [193.142.125.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B77611EFEA; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:47:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:47:12 +0200 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <322434106.20080827234712@marcus-boerger.de> To: "Hannes Magnusson" CC: "Lukas Kahwe Smith" , "PHP Internals List" , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?= In-Reply-To: <7f3ed2c30808271132x7443ea3gc4df903a3a2c73ec@mail.gmail.com> References: <64B4CECA-980F-4738-8B05-E7935741D7BB@pooteeweet.org> <7f3ed2c30808271132x7443ea3gc4df903a3a2c73ec@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] alpha2 scheduled From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Hannes, Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 8:32:41 PM, you wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 18:27, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: >> - Curly braces support for namespaces (Marcus, not ready for alpha2) > Why not? I thought I saw a patch for this on the list recently (which > allowed both the current namespace foo; and namespace foo {} > syntaxes).. It was an incomplete patch that simply allowed the syntax but did not prevent code between two namespaces. Best regards, Marcus