Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:39887 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89283 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2008 15:54:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Aug 2008 15:54:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tony@daylessday.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tony@daylessday.org; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tony@daylessday.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 89.208.40.236 mail.daylessday.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [89.208.40.236] ([89.208.40.236:36368] helo=daylessday.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1C/E4-04075-922B1A84 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:54:18 -0400 Received: from [192.168.3.254] (unknown [212.42.62.198]) by daylessday.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062F7640166; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:54:13 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <48A1B221.9030109@daylessday.org> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:54:09 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20071114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lukas Kahwe Smith CC: Marcus Boerger , php-dev References: <4892E15D.1080004@daylessday.org> <48A19D61.6080502@daylessday.org> <1461769324.20080812165923@marcus-boerger.de> <48A1A6A4.1050801@daylessday.org> <1257013106.20080812172357@marcus-boerger.de> <48A1ACBC.7020808@daylessday.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] enabling everything by default From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal) On 12.08.2008 19:35, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > If we, the RMs, see that these extensions are not yet ready, we will > not hesitate to pull any of them. We will make such a decision before > we go into the RC phase. Until then it would be only fair to not push > the developers in question into such a defensive corner. They should > spend their open source brain cycles on fixing bugs not in this thread. The point is that I don't see any results of this thread. Or rather the results are quite indefinite. Some say these extensions are soooo vital, that should be kept enabled forever, others are in doubt. Some say that they are enabled for alpha only, others say this is not yet final. But the fact is - they are enabled and that concerns me because I do not believe it's going to change at all. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal