Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:39879 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 76747 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2008 15:24:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Aug 2008 15:24:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:55222] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 43/32-04075-21BA1A84 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:24:03 -0400 Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH (unknown [193.142.125.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E918E11DAD4; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:23:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:23:57 +0200 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1257013106.20080812172357@marcus-boerger.de> To: Antony Dovgal CC: php-dev In-Reply-To: <48A1A6A4.1050801@daylessday.org> References: <4892E15D.1080004@daylessday.org> <48A19D61.6080502@daylessday.org> <1461769324.20080812165923@marcus-boerger.de> <48A1A6A4.1050801@daylessday.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] enabling everything by default From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Antony, Tuesday, August 12, 2008, 5:05:08 PM, you wrote: > On 12.08.2008 18:59, Marcus Boerger wrote: >>> See http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=45613 for example. >>> Who would have thought that there are multithreaded web-servers, eh? >> >>> I'm going to disable ext/phar before alpha2. >>> You've been warned. >> >> Fixed :-) > I'm sorry to say that, but the problem is far more deeper than you thought. > No, it still segfaults. Well in that case I'd need more stack traces to fix more and obviously the reaosn to have an alpha and beta phase is for instance getting these fixed. If you still insist on disabling it, you should at least wait till we are closer to release so that we get the chance to fix more of these. Best regards, Marcus