Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:39874
Return-Path: <helly@php.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 68257 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2008 14:59:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 12 Aug 2008 14:59:30 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6
Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:46977] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id B7/70-04075-F45A1A84 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:59:29 -0400
Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH (unknown [193.142.125.1])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C080611F022;
	Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:59:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:59:23 +0200
Reply-To: Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1461769324.20080812165923@marcus-boerger.de>
To: Antony Dovgal <tony@daylessday.org>
CC: php-dev <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <48A19D61.6080502@daylessday.org>
References: <4892E15D.1080004@daylessday.org> <48A19D61.6080502@daylessday.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] enabling everything by default
From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger)

Hello Antony,

Tuesday, August 12, 2008, 4:25:37 PM, you wrote:

> On 01.08.2008 14:11, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>> I can agree that disabling something that was already enabled in 5.2 might create 
>> some confusion, but why enable scarcely created extensions by default, especially if 
>> they are known to cause lost of obscure problems in the past (like Phar)?

> See http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=45613 for example.
> Who would have thought that there are multithreaded web-servers, eh?

> I'm going to disable ext/phar before alpha2.
> You've been warned.

Fixed :-)

Best regards,
 Marcus