Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:39853
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender)
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 02:34:28 +0200
Reply-To: Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net>
Message-ID: <531486582.20080812023428@marcus-boerger.de>
To: Stanislav Malyshev <stas@zend.com>
CC: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <48A0CE14.8020101@zend.com>
References: <909776579.20080803142659@marcus-boerger.de>  <840985F2-A701-4BE4-91F6-F6B39048CF9B@pooteeweet.org>  <48A09FF4.1030101@zend.com> <7f3ed2c30808111411t51553771j389f05c3436bc625@mail.gmail.com> <48A0C415.9090104@zend.com> <161617052.20080812012929@marcus-boerger.de> <48A0CE14.8020101@zend.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Inconsistencies in 5.3
From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger)

Hello Stanislav,

Tuesday, August 12, 2008, 1:41:08 AM, you wrote:

> Hi!

>> Sorry but you never ever provided any logical reasoning for the current
>> way. The reasons that were brought up were:

> It would help the discussion a lot if you actually read my emails. 
> Unfortunately, by now it's clear that you do not. I just wrote a long 
> email outlining the reasons, but I guess reading it would be too much work.

>> a) JavaScript will have it in some future
>> b) We used to have in our first implementation
>> c) We said we were adding namespaces at some point, not saying in which way
>>    we would.

I just read this from you: "We could use "package" or we could use "hexaflexagon" or we could use
"triskaidekaphobia" - oh and there was that very polemic pythin argument.
Dude I am sorry but ther is no argument at all. Unless your long mail is
still on the way. You vary between polemic and spin around arguments
reusing them at will. You promise we discuss and never agree too. Sorry
but for the namespace discussion that is all that made it to me. And I am
sure when I write something hardly anything makes it to you :-)

We can just agree to disagree, so it is for others to decide about. That's
what Lukas' mail was all about, collecting arguments, actually finding
someone to collect and weigh them. And that's why I brought up those three
points, because those are the arguments I do remember - apart from tons of
mails that had no content at all or somehow got filtered by my incoming
mail reading process :-)

Best regards,
 Marcus