Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:39705 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 34218 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2008 16:40:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Aug 2008 16:40:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.163 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.163 il-gw1.zend.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [212.25.124.163] ([212.25.124.163:6107] helo=il-gw1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A7/D0-29324-DE3D9984 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:40:13 -0400 Received: from us-ex1.zend.com ([192.168.16.5]) by il-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 19:40:55 +0300 Received: from [192.168.17.27] ([192.168.17.27]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:40:52 -0700 Message-ID: <4899D413.2010108@zend.com> Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:40:51 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcus Boerger CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <909776579.20080803142659@marcus-boerger.de> <4896EA3C.6010203@zend.com> <4897E9B5.9020006@at.wakwak.com> <200808052035.12199.larry@garfieldtech.com> <489908C2.9040200@at.wakwak.com> <489939C5.2090007@zend.com> <511362913.20080806131236@marcus-boerger.de> In-Reply-To: <511362913.20080806131236@marcus-boerger.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Aug 2008 16:40:52.0134 (UTC) FILETIME=[3060B460:01C8F7E3] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Inconsistencies in 5.3 From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > I do not see an argument in complaining about extending a scheme. But I see > the other solution, use in front of the body, as an introduction of a brand > new scheme. Obviously one is very inconsistent. And besides, global could It will be "obviously" "inconsistent" anyway, because it is a new thing, which doesn't work like old things. > simply ignore '&' as that would have no meaning there at all. So now we should mess with global in order to provide imaginary "consistency". Brilliant. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com