Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:39638 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29508 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2008 17:59:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Aug 2008 17:59:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.134.191 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.134.191 mu-out-0910.google.com Received: from [209.85.134.191] ([209.85.134.191:1929] helo=mu-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EA/21-22351-79347984 for ; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:59:52 -0400 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so1874671mue.3 for ; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:59:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=stVgkondvFUSJX5a73TDJkspK3qhWS1ciQ5PdxNN5F0=; b=Cch2KPbqvpzi0TWUX3+QfhqoIfwTz6L/dGFougmjmf/yVN1Ev37L9fEJppePZBgRI3 MiRzMNfzzGgg4Rc8jy+OhiE1aD3DXoEpg/1I3LDeH/V7SpINJmeXK/SsdAPdCgGga1/n yqFtuVB45fmm8P94GIYqvzFuOYFVDbi1zMgU0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=FtBEZuzSkw3R1ho2fuIdOJxV6DN+kB5g1ABxEOxtTWh0eIk77R6VxjM2KNFM9ljgtb bd9WVH0A9XSUaG0uV5sw1OgS1Xg3RiB3o1rbpIOyFDlxMwrZR5L/zYy/+LaOLJefSzG4 NENj9FY0N6WfQRQf7rY1E6HkZXZoHZAXTIfsQ= Received: by 10.103.223.20 with SMTP id a20mr5772368mur.86.1217872787270; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:59:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.248.20 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:59:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7f3ed2c30808041059u4a0cfd55s8a1e33c45d6a37dd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 19:59:47 +0200 To: "Etienne Kneuss" Cc: "Dmitry Stogov" , "Christian Seiler" , "PHP Internals List" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48970FBC.4060401@zend.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: __invoke concerns From: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com ("Hannes Magnusson") On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 18:45, Etienne Kneuss wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote: >> Hi Christan, >> >> Could you please look into this patch. >> I'm not sure if explicit declaration of Closure::__invoke() is good idea. As >> it cannot provide proper argument information. >> >> May be the patch which you propose already solves this problem for >> reflection. (I didn't have time to look into it). >> > > After discussing it with Dmitry, I removed the reflection part from > the patch, giving full reflection info on Closures seems like a better > idea, even if it requires patching Reflection itself. I'm confused. What exactly is the problem you solved? -Hannes