Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:39618 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 15254 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2008 10:20:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Aug 2008 10:20:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=david.zuelke@bitextender.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=david.zuelke@bitextender.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain bitextender.com designates 80.237.132.12 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: david.zuelke@bitextender.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.237.132.12 wp005.webpack.hosteurope.de Received: from [80.237.132.12] ([80.237.132.12:55754] helo=wp005.webpack.hosteurope.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D5/4D-46562-DD7D6984 for ; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:20:14 -0400 Received: from munich.bitxtender.net ([85.183.90.3] helo=[10.224.254.2]); authenticated by wp005.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM using esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) id 1KPxAh-0007su-9j; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:20:11 +0200 To: Marcus Boerger In-Reply-To: <4110083360.20080804104233@marcus-boerger.de> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: <909776579.20080803142659@marcus-boerger.de> <4896A7C4.8090503@zend.com> <4110083360.20080804104233@marcus-boerger.de> Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 12:20:11 +0200 Cc: Dmitry Stogov , internals@lists.php.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;david.zuelke@bitextender.com;1217845214;a679bffe; Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Inconsistencies in 5.3 From: david.zuelke@bitextender.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?=) Am 04.08.2008 um 10:42 schrieb Marcus Boerger: > Hello Dmitry, > > Monday, August 4, 2008, 8:55:00 AM, you wrote: > >> Hi Marcus, > >> see below > >> Marcus Boerger wrote: >>> Hello Internals, >>> >>> please let's not introduce new inconsistencies. Rather lets make >>> new >>> stuff consistent with old stuff during the alpha phase of 5.3. >>> >>> 1) new keyword 'use'. Semantically it is the same as 'static' or >>> 'global' >>> so it should be used in the same location. > >> For me 'use' is the best keyword as it says that closure uses >> variables >> from current content. (the same keyword is used for import from >> namespaces) > > To be clear, I wasn't complaining about the keyword per se. I just > prefer > it to be inside the curly braces of a closure next to global rather > than in > front of it. I think that's quite a logical and consistent argument. +1 David