Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:39615 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9673 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2008 09:56:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Aug 2008 09:56:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=markus@fischer.name; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=markus@fischer.name; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fischer.name from 213.46.255.22 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: markus@fischer.name X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.46.255.22 viefep18-int.chello.at Solaris 10 (beta) Received: from [213.46.255.22] ([213.46.255.22:36398] helo=viefep12-int.chello.at) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 63/4C-46562-F52D6984 for ; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 05:56:48 -0400 Received: from edge01.upc.biz ([192.168.13.236]) by viefep12-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20080804095645.KALZ25075.viefep12-int.chello.at@edge01.upc.biz> for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:56:45 +0200 Received: from genuine.home ([84.112.136.139]) by edge01.upc.biz with edge01 id y9wW1Z02h30dqkc019wizJ; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 11:56:45 +0200 X-SourceIP: 84.112.136.139 Received: from vserv01.home ([192.168.1.20] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by genuine.home with esmtpa (Exim 4.50) id 1KPwhO-0004zP-4G; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 11:49:54 +0200 Message-ID: <4896D24D.5090106@fischer.name> Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 11:56:29 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrey Hristov CC: Lukas Kahwe Smith , Marcus Boerger , Stefan Priebsch , Hannes Magnusson , Dmitry Stogov , internals@lists.php.net References: <909776579.20080803142659@marcus-boerger.de> <4896A7C4.8090503@zend.com> <7f3ed2c30808040055r377369d0l86f7c39cea7d94b2@mail.gmail.com> <4896BDB3.7000003@e-novative.de> <99710BD7-2224-4AA2-B2DD-1B6A4A5C0DA8@pooteeweet.org> <4110342533.20080804104113@marcus-boerger.de> <71D8CF46-882A-4120-A4D7-B62646703120@pooteeweet.org> <4896CEF9.1090500@hristov.com> In-Reply-To: <4896CEF9.1090500@hristov.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -42 X-Spam-Level: ---- X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "genuine.home", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Andrey Hristov wrote: > isn't that easily solved by using a opcode cache? I think this is also one of the things you won't have often at hosters. [...] Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts -2.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 5 to 20% [score: 0.1963] 1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Inconsistencies in 5.3 From: markus@fischer.name (Markus Fischer) Hi, Andrey Hristov wrote: > isn't that easily solved by using a opcode cache? I think this is also one of the things you won't have often at hosters. I guess there's a speedup by having one file and no cache available, which is the argument here. Question is: where does that leave us :) If I remember correctly in the past it has been appealed to whether the one-file is really a benefit in practice. Who knows and who can tell? cheers, - Markus