Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:39527 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 31191 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2008 10:31:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Aug 2008 10:31:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tony@daylessday.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tony@daylessday.org; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tony@daylessday.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 89.208.40.236 mail.daylessday.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [89.208.40.236] ([89.208.40.236:54164] helo=daylessday.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 61/81-21097-0F5E2984 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 06:31:13 -0400 Received: from [192.168.3.91] (unknown [212.42.62.198]) by daylessday.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E5A6400BD; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:31:09 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <4892E5DD.50907@daylessday.org> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:30:53 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott MacVicar CC: php-dev References: <4892E15D.1080004@daylessday.org> <4892E37B.8060804@macvicar.net> In-Reply-To: <4892E37B.8060804@macvicar.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] enabling everything by default From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal) On 01.08.2008 14:20, Scott MacVicar wrote: > ext/pdo_sqlite and ext/sqlite3 use the same underlying lib so its just > another wrapper but without the PDO crap on top. I know, I know. But why enable it by default (as well as PDO_SQLITE)? What's so extremely useful in this extension that every user needs it? > If you have ideas on testing without enabling them or bundling in the > build please do share. It's a chicken and egg situtation imho. Testing doesn't require enabling it by default. In fact, it doesn't even require putting the extension in the core, though this surely increases the the amount of feedback. Developers should test their extensions, not users. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal