Newsgroups: php.internals,php.internals.win Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:39505 php.internals.win:136 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 74188 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2008 15:30:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Jul 2008 15:30:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=steph@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=steph@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 64.99.136.159 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: steph@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.99.136.159 smtprelay-virgin0159.hostedemail.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [64.99.136.159] ([64.99.136.159:59619] helo=smtprelay-virgin.hostedemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5E/A7-60033-E9AD1984 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:30:39 -0400 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (ff-bigip1 [10.5.19.254]) by smtprelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 61B682BF544; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:30:36 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: 1 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,66ed7b2e427ab7ae,c3af4df2b9e212d1,steph@php.net,,RULES_HIT:355:379:539:540:541:542:543:567:599:601:946:967:973:988:989:1155:1156:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1542:1587:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1766:1792:2073:2075:2078:2379:2393:2525:2553:2559:2563:2682:2685:2691:2693:2828:2857:2859:2900:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3027:3354:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3869:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944:3947:3950:3953:4250:5007:6117:6119:6261:7653:7679:7688:7875:7903:8829,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:none,DNSBL:none X-session-marker: 73746570682E666F78 Received: from foxbox (77-97-189-167.cable.ubr07.shef.blueyonder.co.uk [77.97.189.167]) (Authenticated sender: steph.fox) by omf13.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <034701c8f322$91f6d710$a7bd614d@foxbox> To: "Pierre Joye" Cc: , "internals" References: <032801c8f31f$553595d0$a7bd614d@foxbox> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:31:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Re: [INTERNALS-WIN] Re: [PHP-DEV] Broken Windows build From: steph@php.net ("Steph Fox") Hi Pierre, > It has been like that since literally years. Nothing new under the sun. Erm... no, it hasn't. That's why I'm reporting it now. >> that there is no intention of fixing >> the breakage because 'the 2003 SDK has been a requirement since PHP 5.1'. >> This is the first I ever heard of any such requirement - everything has >> 'just worked' until now with standard out-of-the-box VC6, with or without >> SP* applied. > > Service Packs are another story, they have absolutely nothing to do > with the platform SDK. The snaps box does not use the SP6 but will do > it for 5.3+. Sorry, why? > It does not have impact like binary incompatibilities or > similar bad effects. However the platform SDK 2003/02 is required. Not *required* until this week. That's exactly what I'm telling you. >> Can someone please either explain the need to break a working build >> system >> just before a PHP release or else revert whatever changes caused the >> breakage? > > What you may have missed is the minimum windows version. It has been > bumped to 2k/xp a few months ago. Actually we dropped support for Windows 98. I didn't know we'd also dropped support for NT - if so, there was never any discussion of it on-list. What may have happened is the fixes > in TSRM and Zend to do not override this setting. They both use now > the main php setting and it will be settable using configure before > alpha2 (but it will not work for win9x anyway as some APIs were not > available). I don't care about win9x, we agreed to drop support for it at the end of 2006 as I recall. Not quite sure why you're focusing on that here? > The short version is: there is nothing to revert, the snap box works > and you may simply download the right SDK from (I would say, you > should download it if you really want to do the same bins than snaps): > > http://www.microsoft.com/msdownload/platformsdk/sdkupdate/psdk-full.htm It wants far more space than I actually have on my laptop hard drive. I can't quite believe you're actually making this a *requirement* for the first time just before a release. - Steph