Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:39436 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 14501 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2008 14:40:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jul 2008 14:40:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tony@daylessday.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tony@daylessday.org; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tony@daylessday.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 89.208.40.236 mail.daylessday.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [89.208.40.236] ([89.208.40.236:39324] helo=daylessday.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 53/E8-24886-4DB2F884 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:40:21 -0400 Received: from [192.168.3.91] (unknown [212.42.62.198]) by daylessday.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7708640161; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:40:17 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <488F2BC3.7060906@daylessday.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:40:03 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnaud Le Blanc CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <200807271551.30949.arnaud.lb@gmail.com> <200807271638.47548.arnaud.lb@gmail.com> <200807281726.40115.arnaud.lb@gmail.com> <200807291628.22889.arnaud.lb@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200807291628.22889.arnaud.lb@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Replacement to ticks for signals From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal) On 29.07.2008 18:28, Arnaud Le Blanc wrote: >> I added pcntl_sigwaitinfo(), pcntl_sigtimedwait() and pcntl_sigprocmask() to >> my patch: >> >> http://arnaud.lb.s3.amazonaws.com/pcntl.patch >> >> pcntl_sigwaitinfo() allows to block until the specified signals have been >> delivered. >> pcntl_sigtimedwait() does the same thing, but with a timeout. >> pcntl_sigprocmask() allows to block a set of signals so that they will not > be >> delivered between two calls of the above functions. > > Lukas, Johannes, can I ? (As this is to give an alternative to a deprecated > feature). Could you separate the ticks/dispatch patch from the new functions, please? I just think they are two separate things and therefore should committed in two steps. Other than that, I don't have any objections. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal