Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:39425 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 250 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2008 05:11:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jul 2008 05:11:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:57744] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 37/23-24886-086AE884 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:11:31 -0400 Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH (c-24-6-175-246.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.175.246]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED6411F3BA; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:11:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:11:19 +0200 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1481931098.20080729071119@marcus-boerger.de> To: "Edward Z. Yang" CC: internals@lists.php.net, tswicegood@php.net In-Reply-To: <488E92AB.9030806@thewritingpot.com> References: <488918E3.90705@lerdorf.com> <48892A10.9070905@php.net> <488E92AB.9030806@thewritingpot.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of cvs.php.net? From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Edward, to be honest, what is wrong with svn for you? Do you branch off your own PHP? No, so what's wrong? To easy to use for 99.99% of people using PHP repository? But please (everyone) just think of it and don't comment anymore. The decision has been made we are going for SVN and nothing else at this point. And yes. Once that is done and works for everyone we might look into more complex solutions. Just to make the about 10 developers like myself who really need their own branching support happy. ... dreams can get true :-) marcus Tuesday, July 29, 2008, 5:46:51 AM, you wrote: > Travis Swicegood wrote: >> On a slightly related note, would anyone else be interested in seeing a >> Git repository along side Subversion? Even if people can't commit to >> the Git repo, I'd be happy to help set it up with the ability for them >> to push changes back to the SVN repo once they've prepared their patches. > That would certainly be nice! I would normally advocate a full switch > from CVS to Git, but since it seems the general consensus is to SVN, a > parallel Git repository would greatly aid those of us stuck on Windows > with bjorked git-svn installs. > -- > Edward Z. Yang GnuPG: 0x869C48DA > HTML Purifier Anti-XSS Filter > [[ 3FA8 E9A9 7385 B691 A6FC B3CB A933 BE7D 869C 48DA ]] Best regards, Marcus