Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:39251
Return-Path: <helly@php.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 50083 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2008 21:48:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jul 2008 21:48:18 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6
Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:37065] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 30/7C-12534-C07A7884 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:48:06 -0400
Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH (ip131.fa1-0-1.occ.iinet.com [198.145.32.131])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8693E11F000;
	Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:47:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:47:10 +0200
Reply-To: Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1854618843.20080723234710@marcus-boerger.de>
To: "Steph Fox" <steph@php.net>
CC: "Marcus Boerger" <helly@php.net>, "internals" <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <0a2401c8ed02$20a634a0$a7bd614d@foxbox>
References: <04a501c8d181$e67c6ec0$4401a8c0@foxbox> <1062092242.20080619210052@marcus-boerger.de> <0a2401c8ed02$20a634a0$a7bd614d@foxbox>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] unix path separators in spl
From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger)

Hello Steph,

Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 10:24:35 PM, you wrote:

> Hi Marcus,

>>  how about having this as an option inside the SPL classes that gets
>> turned on by Phar automatically? Inside SPL we could have it as a user
>> set-only flag.

> The attached patch does this, at the SPL end. Can I commit it (or something
> very close) before the 5_3 freeze please?

It's a fix is it not? anyway, please go ahead and submit.

> NB The patch was created with DOS line endings and then converted to *nix, 
> it won't apply cleanly in its current state. It's just for review.

> Thanks,

> - Steph 



Best regards,
 Marcus