Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:39241 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 73229 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2008 17:55:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jul 2008 17:55:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.163 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.163 il-gw1.zend.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [212.25.124.163] ([212.25.124.163:48996] helo=il-gw1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 8B/9D-12534-09077884 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:55:30 -0400 Received: from us-ex1.zend.com ([192.168.16.5]) by il-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:56:00 +0300 Received: from [192.168.16.110] ([192.168.16.110]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:54:55 -0700 Message-ID: <4887706F.5020702@zend.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:54:55 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Antony Dovgal CC: Scott MacVicar , Lucas Nealan , internals@lists.php.net References: <48871835.60502@daylessday.org> <48871914.9080501@macvicar.net> <4887197E.3030404@daylessday.org> In-Reply-To: <4887197E.3030404@daylessday.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Jul 2008 17:54:55.0250 (UTC) FILETIME=[36E5E720:01C8ECED] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Zend Signal Handling From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > Do we really need this option? > Is someone going to disable it and why? I see only reason to disable it if one has some weird system where sigaction is either absent or doesn't work as it should. Not that I know of any, but Unix variants are full of surprises. I'd keep it enabled by default, unless we are on OS that doesn't have sigaction (e.g. Windows or some extremely weird Unix) or in ZTS, of course. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com