Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:39215 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33619 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2008 08:39:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jul 2008 08:39:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=david.zuelke@bitextender.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=david.zuelke@bitextender.com; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain bitextender.com does not designate 80.237.132.12 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: david.zuelke@bitextender.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.237.132.12 wp005.webpack.hosteurope.de Received: from [80.237.132.12] ([80.237.132.12:58874] helo=wp005.webpack.hosteurope.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 48/B3-12534-D5EE6884 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:39:58 -0400 Received: from munich.bitxtender.net ([85.183.90.3] helo=[10.224.251.2]); authenticated by wp005.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM using esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) id 1KLZt5-0002LI-4F; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:39:55 +0200 Cc: Noah Fontes , internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: To: Stanislav Malyshev In-Reply-To: <48864FA5.6050104@zend.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:39:54 +0200 References: <4885E513.6080702@bitextender.com> <48864FA5.6050104@zend.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;david.zuelke@bitextender.com;1216802398;66541d46; Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch for HTTP successful status codes From: david.zuelke@bitextender.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?=) Yeah. We discussed that quite a while back when I sent over the "ignore_errors" options patch-like thing in November: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.devel/46003 I think we should do it. But what about other 3xx redirect codes? How are those handled? David Am 22.07.2008 um 23:22 schrieb Stanislav Malyshev: > Hi! > >> codes as successful. This has posed some problems for us in writing >> RESTful applications effectively, as we're trying to take advantage >> of >> the full spectrum of successful codes. > > I think there should be no big problem to allow all 2xx codes, even > though some ones like 204 may behave strangely, but as long as it > doesn't break anything... > > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect > stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ > (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >