Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:39183 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 99295 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2008 13:06:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jul 2008 13:06:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lars@strojny.net; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lars@strojny.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain strojny.net designates 78.46.69.2 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lars@strojny.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 78.46.69.2 milch.schokokeks.org Received: from [78.46.69.2] ([78.46.69.2:36037] helo=milch.schokokeks.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 31/2A-46193-04BD5884 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:06:10 -0400 Received: from [10.88.8.183] (colt-d53d2146.colt.mediaventures.de [::ffff:213.61.33.70]) (AUTH: PLAIN lars@schokokeks.org, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,CAMELLIA256-SHA) by milch.schokokeks.org with esmtp; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:06:05 +0200 id 000000000000C00F.000000004885DB3D.00000D65 To: Christian Seiler Cc: Lukas Kahwe Smith , PHP Developers Mailing List , kalle@zesix.com In-Reply-To: <4885CF6B.5060600@gmx.net> References: <8A5D4032-1FC4-44BB-90F3-61B802F10159@pooteeweet.org> <6BD46F4A-2733-4160-9A3E-AD49F3002865@pooteeweet.org> <4885CF6B.5060600@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:06:05 +0200 Message-ID: <1216731965.16085.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=_milch.schokokeks.org-3429-1216731966-0001-2" X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] closures questions From: lars@strojny.net (Lars Strojny) --=_milch.schokokeks.org-3429-1216731966-0001-2 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Christian, Am Dienstag, den 22.07.2008, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Christian Seiler: >=20 > >> Calling: $a->b(); will result in method A::B() does not exists. >=20 > Yes, that's expected behaviour (we had a few comments on this on the > list). Hm, I'm not sure who expected it that way. At least Stas and myself voted *for* allowing it. We need to discuss the semantics (the order how methods are resolved, interceptors) but I had the feeling that most of use really much liked that feature. cu, Lars --=_milch.schokokeks.org-3429-1216731966-0001-2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJIhds9AAoJECQPF+sCY6wHlXkQAKWFjXJFsNCR3wU0v0PYhBcZ detAEy7gOvUGLNfBxN/MEmI1JkRN6KR7wHmtD+Wj5bfPthi9Q98C9ytKmuDoP+R3 fg4fneyEgxf2YRCwZ+m5fOs1zqjl+HV1Xboe9NLZi/ZyKw9HB/O1TWCXxQ1STDwB 5Mu70VKiRBgmw7voeUu3v67JLBRlsZuyfdPVX7fMADa9T+Ammi66S426I8ELxkJH w0tyMRR57HEaN03t5bagJLaGxNyzCg7otLgfue9gc2+nle2lcbad03sO43KS3r0B 8kX4JMLAyuDeetO3f3QWYpgpp7iUBPycNO34Q2eyNpnYmEHmFhxgY4ozoRYbMIKg 2M4BX/X1XjdeUp18sbb94MO3GcaKHLLgynDFyVJuOeNyNi3pAdiDCpkfoQM/DbSW KheCWvaKr5FWPquQNRaW5UXpGCrchpKLRLaDe084yPUGVIOP0KKgPIZLtVhnUsQn v14sk3nk1+ls2WIBefG322wWNYMnGwxmh0szcsm2/LitOSbxt6qvfped8dt/vKkz yOpQvM4ffObYmdeMibMGHI3XX8wxgxllIHvlXs++HxjNiYYqnpieIh5vGBWT5IOq +Gu+uVdBvV90McdS1MuN/pbKUhJMBsHPGRfXpZtiSo3WDrfLpGtrZwdqVZb+JVbH waniwhwQnatgs2SbvHHn =5UcH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_milch.schokokeks.org-3429-1216731966-0001-2--