Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:39111 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 81734 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2008 08:44:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jul 2008 08:44:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=letssurf@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=letssurf@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.132.251 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: letssurf@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.132.251 an-out-0708.google.com Received: from [209.85.132.251] ([209.85.132.251:9341] helo=an-out-0708.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 65/46-35040-CFAF2884 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 04:44:44 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so283191anc.1 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:44:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=+/AF0z5yCI1GZ6Ldto7h5Lebg01Gqjnj63ISk7MQYz4=; b=ZdydaL2vviLOXvIOe9x/tB69BmhzEyd1XoEHhS8XE1+6qy8u1MzZlt9WJaJPZ9MuVk fDb+MMUI9F0w+S2TcrrxcRTR0pbQLOY6ZfD9+Lzli4dqMHfz8ksqsUR1afLiEu1+mAme X7XqjHuPvaVZNyKwUbp43WVqv4dPw4qFP9mIw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=kaT6S/NNhd5cLLvrn9IDIwBpiFU3CMcslLtTT4gT9jCRJY3pCw1Gx0wOSyO8R98W9U hocD4jIr2UkaD1iY3yOtVPO4VqSsg/5e4QrZkcLjERu8DsMnzLF9GAIPAU5YTOJUj3DQ 9iAN4GRy+5BhnWzLCWFR5NyzmNGChWmgpcp08= Received: by 10.100.251.5 with SMTP id y5mr1224145anh.125.1216543480930; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:44:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.131.9 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:44:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <462e563f0807200144q7b0ea96cs20711f66803aa6ff@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:44:40 +0100 To: "Nathan Nobbe" Cc: "Lars Strojny" , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <7dd2dc0b0807192245u2ec0ef7fw469b21ae3fc4f2f2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1216464955.1815.0.camel@localhost> <7dd2dc0b0807192245u2ec0ef7fw469b21ae3fc4f2f2@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] E_USER_DEPRECATED From: letssurf@gmail.com ("James Dempster") +1 from me in PHP 5.3 deprecation notices have been split of from E_STRICT into E_DEPRECATED On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Lars Strojny wrote: > >> Hi everbody, >> >> regarding my mail from yesterday, I've also created an RFC for the new >> error level. >> >> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/e-user-deprecated-warning > > > i definitely like the E_USER_DEPRECATED :D im curious though, about > E_DEPRECATED. is this for deprecated functions at the C level, or just the > php api? the reason i ask is because deprecation notices are already issued > via the E_STRICT level, for example, when using is_a() today, w/ E_STRICT > enabled, the following is generated > > Strict standards: is_a(): Deprecated. Please use the instanceof operator in > ... > > would, perhaps, the deprecation level for is_a() move to E_DEPRECATED (i > noticed its still there in 5.3)? > > -nathan >