Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:39110
Return-Path: <quickshiftin@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 66714 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2008 05:45:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jul 2008 05:45:26 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=quickshiftin@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=quickshiftin@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.226 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: quickshiftin@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.226 rv-out-0506.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.198.226] ([209.85.198.226:53204] helo=rv-out-0506.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 4F/74-35040-5F0D2884 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:45:26 -0400
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so714925rvb.23
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
         :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        bh=XKl2bQUQYNf378apuqi3Mgja3jFr4QTwfFQDcE+tWbM=;
        b=WyyppQ9tB/JW7TLPbLv4tpAi3V/jdgrvVGSkJoDO/HvV8GZkqvaVaO8mUagdR33wGo
         vqa7VlIAG5UAoLdAzUDlLzHZASwX4KXgPlRqEdBJxnTiz3VaSxB11wtm1F1P7pG3ZHz7
         hL4Ugh8S6jvcWO1ZEEyIjZpK18kAiODTvxKdE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:references;
        b=u7GXrl0InUWzD9PIBHqza7AfrW8IfluECTzCGSiwhkQs3udBJB/Vi1iFI+1Uhvqv9H
         Oup8vfkTd+bDYVyoFstR0ZEwWeIlVykKvPOQ+IeZ9K/5uiRMuL26+261zLBDr2AZ4k49
         NVmYk9Rfb+mru5cEAdzp+dbG94OrtlQ0CJcA0=
Received: by 10.141.153.16 with SMTP id f16mr1066863rvo.252.1216532722537;
        Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.141.70.10 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <7dd2dc0b0807192245u2ec0ef7fw469b21ae3fc4f2f2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:45:22 -0600
To: "Lars Strojny" <lstrojny@php.net>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <1216464955.1815.0.camel@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_42872_30150284.1216532722497"
References: <1216464955.1815.0.camel@localhost>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] E_USER_DEPRECATED
From: quickshiftin@gmail.com ("Nathan Nobbe")

------=_Part_42872_30150284.1216532722497
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Lars Strojny <lstrojny@php.net> wrote:

> Hi everbody,
>
> regarding my mail from yesterday, I've also created an RFC for the new
> error level.
>
> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/e-user-deprecated-warning


i definitely like the E_USER_DEPRECATED :D  im curious though, about
E_DEPRECATED.  is this for deprecated functions at the C level, or just the
php api?  the reason i ask is because deprecation notices are already issued
via the E_STRICT level, for example, when using is_a() today, w/ E_STRICT
enabled, the following is generated

Strict standards: is_a(): Deprecated. Please use the instanceof operator in
...

would, perhaps, the deprecation level for is_a() move to E_DEPRECATED (i
noticed its still there in 5.3)?

-nathan

------=_Part_42872_30150284.1216532722497--