Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38853 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 68785 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2008 14:20:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Jul 2008 14:20:55 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([127.0.0.1:28643]) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ECSTREAM id F1/85-32540-FF273784 for ; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:00:31 -0400 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=david.zuelke@bitextender.com; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=david.zuelke@bitextender.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain bitextender.com does not designate 80.237.132.12 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: david.zuelke@bitextender.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.237.132.12 wp005.webpack.hosteurope.de Received: from [80.237.132.12] ([80.237.132.12:54590] helo=wp005.webpack.hosteurope.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 90/92-32540-DC763784 for ; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 09:12:46 -0400 Received: from munich.bitxtender.net ([85.183.90.3] helo=client-254-010.dhcp.munich.bitextender.net); authenticated by wp005.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM using esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) id 1KGCzq-0007PS-GS; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:12:42 +0200 Message-ID: <73C27528-157A-4075-921D-BDB595C8F242@bitextender.com> To: PHP Developers Mailing List In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 15:12:41 +0200 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;david.zuelke@bitextender.com;1215522766;af53a15d; Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] towards a 5.3 release From: david.zuelke@bitextender.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?=) Am 02.07.2008 um 22:00 schrieb Lukas Kahwe Smith: > 1) intl extension > Last discussion ended without a decision on the class naming [10]. I > specifically remember Derick taking issue with intl ext "invading" > the date ext namespace. Stas however arguing that the intl ext is > supposed to bring some forwards compatibility to PHP 6 and therefore > naturally will need to span the namespaces of other extensions, that > are planned to be expanded for PHP 6. Well... we had some discussions on the i18n list, and everyone except Stas said we should have consistent class prefixes. That did not stop Stas from simply rolling a final, stable 1.0.0. Even though I and others pointed out other problems with it, where fixing them will break BC. Very unfortunate, this... David