Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38840 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 36479 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2008 00:36:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Jul 2008 00:36:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:28923] helo=mx1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 81/C9-14699-B86B2784 for ; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:36:28 -0400 Received: from us-ex1.zend.com ([192.168.16.5]) by mx1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 8 Jul 2008 03:36:48 +0300 Received: from [192.168.16.110] ([192.168.16.110]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 17:33:51 -0700 Message-ID: <4872B5D4.1000205@zend.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:33:24 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Beaver CC: Lukas Kahwe Smith , PHP Developers Mailing List , Dmitry Stogov References: <486FA5FB.1000300@php.net> In-Reply-To: <486FA5FB.1000300@php.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jul 2008 00:33:51.0236 (UTC) FILETIME=[4B3F8440:01C8E092] Subject: Re: towards a 5.3 release From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > This fixes the logic problem, and re-introduces the performance slowdown > for internal classes. FORTUNATELY there is a simple solution to this, > which is to "use" all global classes: The thing is since it'd work without "use", most users would do it that way and have horrible code. But if you can do use ::Exception, you can the same way do use Foo::Exception, right? So what's the difference? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com