Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38801 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77888 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2008 07:17:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Jul 2008 07:17:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dmitry@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dmitry@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dmitry@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:40648] helo=mx1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 49/4A-02622-813C1784 for ; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 03:17:45 -0400 Received: from ws.home ([10.1.1.1]) by mx1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:18:01 +0300 Message-ID: <4871C311.7050904@zend.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:17:37 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lucas Nealan CC: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jul 2008 07:18:01.0971 (UTC) FILETIME=[97664430:01C8E001] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Zend Signal Handling From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov) I like the idea, and I think we don't need --enable-signals options. BTW I'm not sure about committing it into 5.3. It's a question to RM(s). Thanks. Dmitry. Lucas Nealan wrote: > Hi Internals, > > I am proposing the following RFC to improve signal handling in the Zend > Engine: > > http://wiki.php.net/rfc/zendsignals > > The purpose of zend internal deferred signal handling is to improve the > stability of PHP and extensions when running under any forking SAPI. > Additionally heavy users of APC or other bytecode caches under Apache 1.x > may also see a performance improvement. > > Please see follow the link above to the complete RFC for details. I look > forward to hearing feedback. > > -lucas > >