Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38727
Return-Path: <dmitry@zend.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 49665 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2008 08:34:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 3 Jul 2008 08:34:54 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dmitry@zend.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dmitry@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dmitry@zend.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1
Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:64946] helo=mx1.zend.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id F4/F0-37564-C2F8C684 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 04:34:54 -0400
Received: from ws.home ([10.1.1.1]) by mx1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
	 Thu, 3 Jul 2008 11:35:10 +0300
Message-ID: <486C8F27.20606@zend.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:34:47 +0400
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>
CC: Lukas Kahwe Smith <mls@pooteeweet.org>, 
 Christian Seiler <chris_se@gmx.net>,
 php-dev List <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <486B6960.4030705@gmx.net> <3F379336-B4DC-4495-AD76-3D52ED703E0E@pooteeweet.org> <alpine.DEB.0.98.0807031005150.16594@kossu.ez.no>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.0.98.0807031005150.16594@kossu.ez.no>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jul 2008 08:35:10.0266 (UTC) FILETIME=[B46D09A0:01C8DCE7]
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6 (and forget 5.4) (Was: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Closures:
 updated proposal and patch)
From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov)

Absolutely agree.

I don't see any reason for 5.4. We don't plan any significant new features.

Thanks. Dmitry.

Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> 
>> On 02.07.2008, at 13:41, Christian Seiler wrote:
>>
>> So as things look atm, closures will have to wait until then. But cool
>> features like closures, traits etc will undoubtedly increase the incentive to
>> get working quickly on 5.4 and this can happen as soon as we have 5.3 out the
>> door and working well for our user base.
> 
> Actually, we should forget about 5.4 and focus on 6.0 instead. It has 
> been lingering for waay to long now.
> 
> regards,
> Derick
>