Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38726 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 46678 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2008 08:16:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Jul 2008 08:16:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 213.123.20.127 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.123.20.127 c2bthomr09.btconnect.com Received: from [213.123.20.127] ([213.123.20.127:24325] helo=c2bthomr09.btconnect.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D8/80-37564-6FA8C684 for ; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 04:16:55 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (host81-138-11-136.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.138.11.136]) by c2bthomr09.btconnect.com with ESMTP id BHR29887; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 09:14:56 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <486C8A07.2060808@lsces.co.uk> Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:12:55 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP internals References: <486B6960.4030705@gmx.net> <3F379336-B4DC-4495-AD76-3D52ED703E0E@pooteeweet.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2bthomr09.btconnect.com X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090201.486C8AF3.0165,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=127.0.0.1, so=2007-10-30 19:00:17, dmn=5.4.3/2008-02-01 X-Junkmail-IWF: false Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6 (and forget 5.4) (Was: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Closures: updated proposal and patch) From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) Derick Rethans wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > >> On 02.07.2008, at 13:41, Christian Seiler wrote: >> >> So as things look atm, closures will have to wait until then. But cool >> features like closures, traits etc will undoubtedly increase the incentive to >> get working quickly on 5.4 and this can happen as soon as we have 5.3 out the >> door and working well for our user base. > > Actually, we should forget about 5.4 and focus on 6.0 instead. It has > been lingering for waay to long now. YES PLEASE .... -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/lsces/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php