Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38612 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 12217 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2008 11:41:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Jun 2008 11:41:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=scott@macvicar.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=scott@macvicar.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain macvicar.net from 193.227.246.108 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: scott@macvicar.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 193.227.246.108 ip246-108-v193.static.x-ip.net Received: from [193.227.246.108] ([193.227.246.108:33091] helo=lovelace.midden.org.uk) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2F/C7-03263-6EE22684 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:41:26 -0400 Received: from office.vbulletin.com ([217.155.246.60] helo=[10.0.0.116]) by lovelace.midden.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KBTNI-0000im-Ao; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:41:22 +0100 Message-ID: <48622EDA.7040900@macvicar.net> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:41:14 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RQuadling@GoogleMail.com CC: barry@barrycarlyon.co.uk, internals References: <4862267F.4000303@barrycarlyon.co.uk> <10845a340806250431j51d8c030ue991683bde83063a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <10845a340806250431j51d8c030ue991683bde83063a@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam_Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "lovelace.midden.org.uk", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: We'll end up asking for OS after we can't reproduce it on Linux. OS is definately needed. Scott [...] Content analysis details: (-4.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] GSoC Bugtracker From: scott@macvicar.net (Scott MacVicar) We'll end up asking for OS after we can't reproduce it on Linux. OS is definately needed. Scott Richard Quadling wrote: > 2008/6/25 Barry Carlyon : > >> Greetings all, >> >> For the basic, basic, basic bug tracker, (none of this pear/pecl shit, >> *jokes*) I currently have the following form: >> >> http://gsoc.barrycarlyon.servegame.org/report/ >> >> Do we need anymore basic, basic, basic bug trackers fields? >> Do we actually need the OS field, someone (I forget who) suggested we don't >> need it. >> >> So please reply and let me know. >> >> Yours, >> >> -- >> -------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Barry Carlyon >> > > If not having the OS option means more windows bugs will be fixed as the > core-devs won't know if it is *nix or windows, then don't ask for the OS. > (He he). > > > >