Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38592 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80337 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2008 17:00:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Jun 2008 17:00:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:13641] helo=mx1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 7E/E2-17106-22821684 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:00:20 -0400 Received: from us-ex1.zend.com ([192.168.16.5]) by mx1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:00:29 +0300 Received: from [192.168.16.110] ([192.168.16.110]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:59:46 -0700 Message-ID: <486127F2.7030704@zend.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:59:30 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Janusz Lewandowski CC: PHP internals References: <485C5081.1050609@zend.com> <485FDBE2.6020409@zend.com> <486122CC.5050303@zend.com> <353f2c6f0806240952n6bcb1c6am47787ab65f837ee2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <353f2c6f0806240952n6bcb1c6am47787ab65f837ee2@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jun 2008 16:59:46.0493 (UTC) FILETIME=[B4BEE6D0:01C8D61B] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] LSB forward_static_call() From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) > Currently, this will output BA. You can't tell me, that it is consistent. Sure, it's very inconsistent. Also, when you do 2+3, the result is 5, and when you do 2*3, result is 6. It's very inconsistent too. Let's change + to do multiplication, so it'd be "consistent". Why on earth different functions, created for different purposes, used in different contexts, should always give you the same result? What idea of "consistency" is that? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com