Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38587 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 73733 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2008 16:42:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Jun 2008 16:42:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:10869] helo=mx1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 95/71-17106-1F321684 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:42:26 -0400 Received: from us-ex1.zend.com ([192.168.16.5]) by mx1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:42:36 +0300 Received: from [192.168.16.110] ([192.168.16.110]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:37:48 -0700 Message-ID: <486122CC.5050303@zend.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:37:32 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Zakhlestin CC: Etienne Kneuss , PHP internals References: <485C5081.1050609@zend.com> <485FDBE2.6020409@zend.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jun 2008 16:37:48.0312 (UTC) FILETIME=[A30C7180:01C8D618] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] LSB forward_static_call() From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > in my ActiveRecord, table for DepartmentUsers would actually exist ;) Even worse. All the data is in the Users table, DepartmentUsers is just a functionality extension. So you'll be operating on wrong data. > I am just looking for consistency. I am expecting get_called_class() > to work as a static analog of get_class(this) Can we PLEASE stop using "consistency" to mean "do as I say"? What "consistency" is in changing way parent:: worked for years, making parent:: and class:: work differently and disabling non-forwarding call? Consistency with what - with your wishes? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com