Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38571 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 18177 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2008 14:10:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Jun 2008 14:10:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.94.239.7 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.7 mail.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.94.239.7] ([82.94.239.7:55916] helo=mail.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A4/16-17106-F3001684 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:10:08 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.7/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m5OEA3QU013633; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:10:04 +0200 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:10:04 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@kossu.ez.no To: Andi Gutmans cc: Lukas Kahwe Smith , Stas Malyshev , Steph Fox , internals In-Reply-To: <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE01B113E1@us-ex1.zend.net> Message-ID: References: <00cf01c8c242$f1a6ce10$4401a8c0@foxbox> <10845a340805300354y35e28f30r30eb6e8edebf0ef1@mail.gmail.com> <48422F7C.1030002@zend.com> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE01B113E1@us-ex1.zend.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] New flame From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > From: Lukas Kahwe Smith [mailto:mls@pooteeweet.org] > > > > > I was under impression parser multibyte support wasn't yet fixed. > > > Was it? > > > > Maybe we should decide if this a show stopper or not. From my > > understanding we still do not have any example of this being used in > > the wild .. > > This is used when reading scripts that are in encodings like Shift-JIS > which is very common in Japan. In any case, I have tried to get > involvement from some people I know over there without much success. I've asked around a bit as well with our customers/partners, and all they seem to answer is "we simply use UTF-8". regards, Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ezcomponents.org | http://xdebug.org