Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38515 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 654 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2008 20:03:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jun 2008 20:03:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lars@strojny.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lars@strojny.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain strojny.net designates 78.46.69.2 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lars@strojny.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 78.46.69.2 milch.schokokeks.org Received: from [78.46.69.2] ([78.46.69.2:43653] helo=milch.schokokeks.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E6/A1-23032-C00BE584 for ; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:03:24 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] (xdsl-87-79-208-209.netcologne.de [::ffff:87.79.208.209]) (AUTH: PLAIN lars@schokokeks.org, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,CAMELLIA256-SHA) by milch.schokokeks.org with esmtp; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:03:20 +0200 id 000000000000C012.00000000485EB008.000019E7 To: Etienne Kneuss Cc: PHP internals In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:03:19 +0200 Message-ID: <1214164999.18833.7.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=_milch.schokokeks.org-6631-1214165000-0001-2" X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] LSB forward_static_call() From: lars@strojny.net (Lars Strojny) --=_milch.schokokeks.org-6631-1214165000-0001-2 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Etienne, Am Freitag, den 20.06.2008, 18:04 +0200 schrieb Etienne Kneuss: [...] > 2) parent:: carries the info while ParentClassName:: doesn't > + convenient > + no functionnality lost > - introduces a difference between parent:: and classname::, but > restricted to LSB so no BC break Thanks for bringing this on topic again. I would like to see 2) implemented, as the current behaviour looks unpredictable to strangers. Stas, you argued, that non-forward static calls would no longer be possible? Doesn't the con argument in Etiennes list solve that issue or do I miss something? If you want non-forwarding calls, use ::method()? cu, Lars --=_milch.schokokeks.org-6631-1214165000-0001-2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJIXrAHAAoJECQPF+sCY6wHKW4P/3BTVyYxy757d5Fm2Os89DQ9 FWS7CVwlGjk3FP9/6tHV/q/bj07KcUA74vTqNjzdDvaXiV09p6IFCjeWtKfn06wy /1xTJodOt0lRSMy10VWFbK3x630fkFpqzNzbp/pOEyiz3IS7l6Glsdym92QErQuo bfvdtfFfhp9cwjZ6xJSs0mPg92TrPWDNVRj9RtIh6DXzzxIOAlA+6GALwIUvdi2Y Zvdbrhq6diRGl/pV/xw4KXWP2BkJDGRx3KHA4olQCzPKKnEpXxPp7RY/Z0M9v4mq BCfl6q9C0d5W+JdmDK5ii4Uau7MCBrb7Sa0kiV/GFIJSA6vXnMx2pMmwYS9KTGWI xX4XLmfh1TJ/iAo9YpSLUyQoHqXauva5xgFPhcnE5FWd1BqPFQBvPoDfIkdSCgKP PkM3qcawA0SyWVBZ0hyHF1zIwubp9TYKBH5jjjXd5F9XhR1vIClWrss/cBVd33+F 3F+SYXm2Wasr9+uTflGChl0dE3cJWGtl5iLDHvytOZbEl6IgON2PJSTNaQTSKCKB 2NAIuldtxHOz73LDq/T+mkpgW6iXwEIFbEF364MwjQt4lvAvDYjj2EuQT5KUj5gB h9qCXBAmIe+eWDhR/Lvqh5PXbyrV/kaD9xCMWccZdZ0er2mjME5wkgli+pssAsjY 20sG1Xz6bfkeOqJINB8p =8bLG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_milch.schokokeks.org-6631-1214165000-0001-2--