Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38491 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 17878 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2008 20:06:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jun 2008 20:06:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=troelskn@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=troelskn@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.128.184 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: troelskn@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.128.184 fk-out-0910.google.com Received: from [209.85.128.184] ([209.85.128.184:28541] helo=fk-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 19/F4-12821-4BD0C584 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:06:13 -0400 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so1438155fks.7 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:06:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=XugFE0/CWCkuWWMw+bRIdA4C5QZ2X0W+4heEyaT81i8=; b=xje4AbFKzHlHUAVFztc+OOCBr7X0L7Q/iGin/raJNJmcgt9DPfgyHn7ZX26fW2rX4R esjpxGIgNrxOGW3dOCQCY4Sd00RAdrxJY7hBf/uUirBL9tk+KUQYH3mPK6WD9b6xlnDL Au+qk/Hg6+rbc63MXFKNSGdnXG7FguevGiB9Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=nsYYH3BqPi8HPLo1WEg+zUYN9PGX7LbJUjfZX/YoD/AOkY21hZW99vbMqArCgWlDvp xqD2TCBrMJt7RI2tr2eVIgHb8u9LxIhWasRces9b7A+E6A2qGRW04lagdNWhNaJ5Ew6s K+vDph9wH5Dp/mw9/tWaQoCn0I+P24T4aUJzM= Received: by 10.78.191.3 with SMTP id o3mr1758908huf.48.1213992369270; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.195.3 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <98b8086f0806201306x29fc58b7s427d26babdadb2cf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:06:09 +0200 To: "Markus Fischer" Cc: "Christian Seiler" , "php-dev List" In-Reply-To: <485C06C8.7050203@fischer.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4856A547.3080801@gmx.net> <485C06C8.7050203@fischer.name> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] [RFC] Closures and lambda functions in PHP From: troelskn@gmail.com ("troels knak-nielsen") On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Markus Fischer wrote: > Since some raised issues with the word "lexical", what do people think to > just re-use the (afaik deprecated) "var" keyword, so we won't need a new > keyword in the chain. What exactly is the problem with "lexical"? I find it quite descriptive, and I don't see how it could be confused with any other keywords?