Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38489 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4051 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2008 19:36:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jun 2008 19:36:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=markus@fischer.name; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=markus@fischer.name; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fischer.name from 62.179.121.49 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: markus@fischer.name X-Host-Fingerprint: 62.179.121.49 viefep31-int.chello.at Solaris 10 (beta) Received: from [62.179.121.49] ([62.179.121.49:54318] helo=viefep31-int.chello.at) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9F/22-12821-FC60C584 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:36:48 -0400 Received: from genuine.home ([84.112.136.139]) by viefep31-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.02 201-2186-121-104-20070414) with ESMTP id <20080620193643.RVHL25153.viefep31-int.chello.at@genuine.home>; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:36:43 +0200 Received: from ncvielp07.home ([192.168.1.51]) by genuine.home with esmtpa (Exim 4.50) id 1K9mKh-0001Nq-Tv; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:31:43 +0200 Message-ID: <485C06C8.7050203@fischer.name> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:36:40 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Seiler CC: php-dev List References: <4856A547.3080801@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <4856A547.3080801@gmx.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 OpenPGP: id=C2272BD0; url=http://markus.fischer.name/my_public_key.txt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -32 X-Spam-Level: --- X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "genuine.home", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Since some raised issues with the word "lexical", what do people think to just re-use the (afaik deprecated) "var" keyword, so we won't need a new keyword in the chain. cheers, - Markus [...] Content analysis details: (-3.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4480] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] [RFC] Closures and lambda functions in PHP From: markus@fischer.name (Markus Fischer) Since some raised issues with the word "lexical", what do people think to just re-use the (afaik deprecated) "var" keyword, so we won't need a new keyword in the chain. cheers, - Markus