Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:3844
Return-Path: <cunha17@uol.com.br>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 38094 invoked by uid 1007); 9 Aug 2003 22:38:47 -0000
Message-ID: <20030809223846.38093.qmail@pb1.pair.com>
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <20030809210710.97648.qmail@pb1.pair.com> <200308091839.42975.ilia@prohost.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 19:38:44 -0300
Lines: 23
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Posted-By: 200.196.104.198
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2
From: cunha17@uol.com.br ("Cristiano Duarte")

"Ilia Alshanetsky" <ilia@prohost.org> escreveu na mensagem
news:200308091839.42975.ilia@prohost.org...
> I wouldn't worry about the EXPERIMENTAL label, but rather whether the
PHP's
> Apache 2 interface works for you and if there are any bug reports that may
> affect you. Personally, I do not yet see a reason to switch to Apache 2
from
> Apache 1, but that's just me. Comparatively speaking, Apache 1 PHP
interface
> has been used & developed for several years, while Apache 2 interface
> (current implementation) is less then a year old. Every release we fix
> several bugs, which at least in part responsible for it's EXPERIMENTAL
> status.
Are these bugs related to Apache2 interface or Apache2 multithreaded
(worker) ?

> Redhat released a beta compiler despite warnings from developers of said
> compiler.
Shame on them. :-(

Cristiano Duarte