Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38345
Return-Path: <tony@daylessday.org>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 76443 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2008 11:16:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jun 2008 11:16:26 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tony@daylessday.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tony@daylessday.org; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tony@daylessday.org
X-Host-Fingerprint: 89.208.40.236 mail.daylessday.org Linux 2.6
Received: from [89.208.40.236] ([89.208.40.236:42673] helo=daylessday.org)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 6A/3B-03518-88EE8584 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:16:25 -0400
Received: from [172.28.72.84] (217_74_245_136.kubangsm.ru [217.74.245.136])
	by daylessday.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700E16400E4;
	Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:16:11 +0400 (MSD)
Message-ID: <4858EE6E.8050906@daylessday.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:15:58 +0400
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
CC: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>, 
 Etienne Kneuss <colder@php.net>
References: <fe05d1540806160328u11a9246au232cc5ea8da3327d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <fe05d1540806160328u11a9246au232cc5ea8da3327d@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FastArray, great addition
From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal)

On 16.06.2008 14:28, Pierre Joye wrote:
> My only wish is to actually respect the informal decision we took a
> while back, to do not use "fast", "improved", "better" or similar
> wording in function or extension names. What's about naming it CArray
> or something similar? To reflect what it is, it is not a fast(er) hash
> table like our current array, it is a C-like array.

I can live with any name, so feel free to choose whatever you like most.

<offtopic>
Though I'd like to be able to cast these arrays to PHP's arrays 
and we need to implement get_properties() handler for that.
If there are no objections, I'll commit my patch when 
I get back home (30th of June).

-- 
Wbr, 
Antony Dovgal