Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38332 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 32748 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2008 19:51:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Jun 2008 19:51:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:47865] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C0/C7-24906-9B518584 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:51:22 -0400 Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH (unknown [193.142.125.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE89B1FA81; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:51:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:51:15 +0200 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1164326521.20080617215115@marcus-boerger.de> To: Stanislav Malyshev CC: Marcus Boerger , Christian Seiler , Johannes Schlueter , php-dev List In-Reply-To: <48580E5C.9090100@zend.com> References: <4856A547.3080801@gmx.net> <1961603263.20080617120320@marcus-boerger.de> <4857ACE1.3050501@gmx.net> <1178748433.20080617211038@marcus-boerger.de> <48580E5C.9090100@zend.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] [RFC] Closures and lambda functions in PHP From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Stanislav, nicely put but not in agreement with the PHP world. First we cannot add a new feature like this in a mini release as it comes with an API change. And second PHP is not anywhere close so we'd have to do it in a PHP 5.4 and personally I would like to avoid it. marcus Tuesday, June 17, 2008, 9:19:56 PM, you wrote: > Hi! >> Johannes, what's your take on this one for 5.3? > I'm not Johannes and I didn't review the proposal in detail yet, but I > think we have enough for 5.3 right now. I'd think we better concentrate > on tying the loose ends and rolling beta out and then moving towards the > release than adding more and more features and never releasing it. 5.3 > is not the final release until the end of times, there will be 5.4 etc. > and 6, so there will be ample opportunity to add stuff. And 5.3 has > enough stuff to be released, there's no rush to add more new things, > especially radically new ones. My opinion is that we better take some > time with it and not tie it to 5.3. > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect > stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ > (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com Best regards, Marcus