Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:38284 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 48864 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2008 13:35:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Jun 2008 13:35:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=greg@chiaraquartet.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=greg@chiaraquartet.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain chiaraquartet.net from 38.99.98.18 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: greg@chiaraquartet.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 38.99.98.18 beast.bluga.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [38.99.98.18] ([38.99.98.18:58167] helo=mail.bluga.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A9/E7-06776-43C66584 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:35:49 -0400 Received: from mail.bluga.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bluga.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B03491E0BB; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:35:52 -0700 (MST) Received: from [192.168.0.106] (CPE-76-84-4-101.neb.res.rr.com [76.84.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bluga.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B5891E0B3; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:35:50 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <48566C51.9010807@chiaraquartet.net> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:36:17 -0500 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye CC: PHP internals , Etienne Kneuss , Marcus Boerger , Antony Dovgal References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: FastArray, great addition From: greg@chiaraquartet.net (Gregory Beaver) Pierre Joye wrote: > hi all, > > As you noticed already PHP finally got simple C-like array, thanks to > Etienne and Tony for their great work! > > My only wish is to actually respect the informal decision we took a > while back, to do not use "fast", "improved", "better" or similar > wording in function or extension names. What's about naming it CArray > or something similar? To reflect what it is, it is not a fast(er) hash > table like our current array, it is a C-like array. Why not call it SplVector? Greg